On optimal betting strategies with multiple mutually exclusive outcomes

Abstract We examine the problem of how much risk‐averse agents would be willing to bet on events where there are multiple possible winners but only one will actually win. We describe how this problem can be solved for concave utility functions and illustrate the properties of the solution. The optim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of economic research
Main Author: Whelan, Karl
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 11-09-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract We examine the problem of how much risk‐averse agents would be willing to bet on events where there are multiple possible winners but only one will actually win. We describe how this problem can be solved for concave utility functions and illustrate the properties of the solution. The optimal betting strategy is more aggressive than strategies derived from considering each outcome separately such as the Kelly criterion. The strategy also recommends sometimes placing bets with negative expected returns because they act as hedges against losses on other bets. While this strategy maximizes the bettor's subjective expected utility, if betting odds incorporate a profit margin and reflect underlying probabilities correctly, then this more aggressive approach loses more money and results in lower realized utility.
ISSN:0307-3378
1467-8586
DOI:10.1111/boer.12474