Orhun Yazıtlarındaki Er- Bar- İkilemesi Üzerine
Studies about Orkhun inscriptions proceed rapidly today. The approach to the inscriptions should now be more detailed in new researches. There are still problems with translations the inscriptions. Detailed explanations should be made on each word for correct understanding of the sentences in the Or...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Old Turkic Studies Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 471 - 501 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Erdem Uçar
24-06-2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Studies about Orkhun inscriptions proceed rapidly today. The approach to the inscriptions should now be more detailed in new researches. There are still problems with translations the inscriptions. Detailed explanations should be made on each word for correct understanding of the sentences in the Orkhun inscriptions. The reduplication är- bar- is found in four places: Köl Tigin East 23 = Bilgä Qaγan East 19, Köl Tigin North 1 and Bilgä Qaγan East 29. The four reproductions, which provide a copy of the inscriptions, have allied with the signs in the reduplication. Therefore, there is no difference in the reading of the reduplication. The article lists the previous interpretations for the reduplication. After the interpretation proposals were analyzed, the meaning of the reduplication in question were re-evaluated.
Studies about Orkhun inscriptions proceed rapidly today. The approach to the inscriptions should now be more detailed in new researches. There are still problems with translations the inscriptions. Detailed explanations should be made on each word for correct understanding of the sentences in the Orkhun inscriptions. The reduplication är- bar- is found in four places: Köl Tigin East 23 = Bilgä Qaγan East 19, Köl Tigin North 1 and Bilgä Qaγan East 29. The four reproductions, which provide a copy of the inscriptions, have allied with the signs in the reduplication. Therefore, there is no difference in the reading of the reduplication. The article lists the previous interpretations for the reduplication. After the interpretation proposals were analyzed, the meaning of the reduplication in question were re-evaluated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2564-6400 2564-6400 |
DOI: | 10.35236/jots.553478 |