Graveside and Other Asymmetrical Promises
People who make graveside promises consider themselves bound by them, which raises the question of whether a promise can morally obligate a promisor directly to a promisee who cannot acknowledge the promise. I show that it can by using the theoretical framework provided by "transaction accounts...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social theory and practice Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 469 - 483 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tallahassee
Department of Philosophy, Florida State University
01-10-2018
Florida State University |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | People who make graveside promises consider themselves bound by them, which raises the question of whether a promise can morally obligate a promisor directly to a promisee who cannot acknowledge the promise. I show that it can by using the theoretical framework provided by "transaction accounts" of promising. Paradigmatically, these accounts maintain that the creation of a promissory obligation requires that the promisee consent to the promise. I extend these accounts to capture promises made by proxy and self-promises, and conclude that we can make promises to absent promisees when we bear responsibility for their moral and personal development. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0037-802X 2154-123X |
DOI: | 10.5840/soctheorpract201891344 |