Rapid Screening of Methane-Reducing Compounds for Deployment via Water with a Commercial Livestock Supplement Using In Vitro and FTIR-ATR Analyses

• Published in: Methane Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 437 - 455
• Main Authors: Batley, Ryan J., Romanzini, Elieder Prates, Johnson, Joel B., de Souza, William Luiz, Naiker, Mani, Trotter, Mark G., Quigley, Simon P., de Souza Congio, Guilhermo Francklin, Costa, Diogo Fleury Azevedo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 02-08-2024
• Subjects: feeding strategies; greenhouse gas; ruminant methane reduction; uPRO supplements; water medication
• ISSN: 2674-0389; 2674-0389
• DOI: 10.3390/methane3030025

The addition of methane-reducing compounds (MRCs) to livestock drinking water presents an alternative method for enteric methane mitigation in extensive systems where these compounds cannot be fed through the diet. This work evaluated several such compounds with the potential to be deployed in this manner. Methane-reducing compounds were selected based on the existing literature and likelihood of dissolution when combined with a commercially available water-based nutrient supplement (uPRO) (uPRO ORANGE®, DIT AgTech, QLD, Australia). This, in turn, would demonstrate the capacity for MRCs to be administered through animal drinking water when such supplements are in use. This technique requires the analysis of MRC solubility and stability in solution, which was completed via Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy. The uPRO supplement is comprised of urea, urea phosphate, and ammonium sulfate, providing nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur—limiting nutrients for ruminants grazing extensive systems during drier periods of the year. Accordingly, medium-quality Rhodes grass hay was used in fermentation runs to simulate a basal diet during the dry season. Methane-reducing compounds were assessed in accordance with each variable measured (gas/methane production, dry matter digestibility, stability under different environmental conditions) along with existing research in the field to determine the most suitable compound for co-administration. Whilst most compounds examined in this study appeared to retain their structure in solution with uPRO, fermentation results varied in terms of successful methane mitigation. The additive Agolin Ruminant L emerged as the most promising compound for further in vivo investigation.