FRI397 An Unusual Case Of Galactorrhea- Think About Breast Implants
Disclosure: P. rimal: None. C. Musurakis: None. J.L. Gilden: None. Introduction: Elevation of prolactin (PRL) levels can occur due to physiologic or pathologic disorders of lactotroph cells. The most common causes for hypersecretion and resulting galactorrhea (GAL), a milky breast discharge, are pre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Endocrine Society Vol. 7; no. Supplement_1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
US
Oxford University Press
05-10-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Disclosure: P. rimal: None. C. Musurakis: None. J.L. Gilden: None.
Introduction: Elevation of prolactin (PRL) levels can occur due to physiologic or pathologic disorders of lactotroph cells. The most common causes for hypersecretion and resulting galactorrhea (GAL), a milky breast discharge, are pregnancy, breast feeding, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, medications, chest wall trauma, or even stress. Although GAL is a rare complication after breast augmentation or reconstruction surgery, it can be bilateral, ipsilateral or contralateral, and is thought to be self-limiting. GAL can be cosmetically and psychologically distressing. The treatment depends on identifying the underlying cause, severity of symptoms, and can be medical, surgical, and might even necessitate breast implant removal. Clinical case: A 34-year-old Latina female G3P2 AB1 with prediabetes (BMI=22), history of gestational diabetes, and migraine headaches, was referred to the endocrine clinic for elevated PRL levels and 2 years of persistent GAL. Although originally regular, she had 3 months of menometrorrhagia following a COVID booster. She denied recent pregnancy, breast-feeding, breast masses, hirsutism, symptoms of thyroid disorders, chest wall trauma, infection, or symptoms of pituitary dysfunction. She was not taking medications associated with PRL elevation. Upon further evaluation, she reported frequently massaging the bilateral cosmetic breast implants to avoid formation of scar tissue. Lab evaluation showed initial PRL elevation of 35.8 ng/mL (nl=2.8-29.2); with normal LH=10.9 mIU/mL(nl 1.9-12.5) and FSH =4.9 mIU/mL(nl 2.5-10.2); estradiol=200.89 pg/mL(19.5-144.2); progesterone <0.5 ng/mL(nl <0.8);urine pregnancy test negative, HCG normal <2.6 mIU/mL (nl 2.6-4.2) ; ACTH=14 pg/mL (nl 0-47); AM cortisol=13.33 mcg/dL; salivary cortisol=<0.03 and 0.05 mcg/dL(nl 0.004-0.56); free testosterone=3.2 pg/mL(nl 0.1-6.4); SHBG =83.55 nmol/L(nl 17.69-138.26) total testosterone slightly elevated 50 ng/dL (nl 2-45); DHEAS=215 mcg/dL(nl 35-430); normal thyroid tests [(TSH 1.06 uIU/mL(0.550-4.780 ), free T4=1.05 ng/dL(0.76-1.46) Thyroid peroxidase antibody 28 U/mL(0-60)], Pelvic Ultrasound-benign right ovarian cyst and left ovary with subcm. follicles. Normal MRI of pituitary. Mammogram-dense breasts with bilateral implants. A Repeat PRL was 20.4 ng/mL with monomeric PRL normal at 8.6 (3.2-25.2 ng/mL), and later 13.70 ng/mL after stopping massaging of the breasts. The etiology of GAL was attributed to the breast implants with massaging, after excluding all other potential causes. Conclusion: Although other etiologies for galactorrhea should be considered, breast implants with manipulation must always be thought of as a possibility. This case highlights the importance of taking a thorough and complete medical history when evaluating all patients with galactorrhea.
Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2472-1972 2472-1972 |
DOI: | 10.1210/jendso/bvad114.1590 |