Laparoscopic-assisted gastric pull-up: initial experience and technical details

• Published in: Journal of pediatric endoscopic surgery Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 55 - 60
• Main Authors: Molino, J. A., Gine, C., Guillén, G., López-Fernández, S., Garcia, L., Rocha, O., Lain, A., Lloret, Josep, Perez-Etchepare, E., Culebras, M. Gomez, López, Manuel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 01-06-2020
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Pediatric Surgery; Review Article; Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Esophageal atresia; Laparoscopy; Pediatric; Caustic esophageal stricture; Long gap
• ISSN: 2524-7875; 2524-7883
• DOI: 10.1007/s42804-020-00049-7

Aim
To describe our initial experience in laparoscopic-assisted gastric pull-up via posterior mediastinal route in comparison with our historic experience performed by open laparotomy gastric pull-up via retrosternal route. The results of the two approaches were evaluated in this study.
Materials and methods
Between 2000 and 2017, we conducted a retrospective review of all patients that had undergone gastric transposition for esophageal atresia (EA) and long caustic strictures when preservation of the native esophagus was  not possible.
Results
A total of 17 pediatric patients underwent gastric pull-up transposition as esophageal replacement technique. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A (2000–2015) consisted of 11 patients that underwent open laparotomy gastric pull-up via the retrosternal route. Three Group A patients had EA Type I, two had EA Type II, five had EA Type III, and one long caustic stricture. Associated anomalies included VACTERL association in two cases, Down syndrome in one case and intestinal malrotation in one case. The mean age at surgery was 2.2 years and the mean follow-up was 9.3 years. All patients were able to achieve oral feeds. Group B (2016–2018) consisted of six patients that underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastric transposition via posterior mediastinal pathway. Three had EA Type I, two had EA Type III, and one had a long caustic esophageal stricture. Associated anomalies included a single case of VACTERL association. Previous surgeries included two thoracotomies and two esophagostomies in patients with EA/TEF and one gastro-jejunal anastomosis in a patient with pyloric total disconnection after pyloric balloon dilatation for caustic esophageal and pyloric stricture. All patients underwent gastrostomy. Laparoscopic procedure was successfully completed in all patients without conversion. The mean follow-up in Group B was 27 months. All patients were able to establish oral feeds.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic-assisted gastric pull-up as esophageal replacement technique is safe and has few complications. Slight modifications of the technique such as pyloric dilation reduce laparoscopic surgical time.