Mass distribution in the quasi-mono-energetic neutron-induced fission of 232Th

. The cumulative yields of various fission products in 232 Th(n, f) with average neutron energies of 6.35, 8.53 and 10.09 MeV have been determined using an off-line -ray spectrometric technique. The neutron beam was produced from the 7 Li(p, n) reaction. From the cumulative fission yields, the mass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European physical journal. A, Hadrons and nuclei Vol. 50; no. 9
Main Authors: Naik, H., Crasta, Rita, Suryanarayana, S. V., Prajapati, P. M., Mulik, V. K., Shivasankar, B. S., Jagadeesan, K. C., Thakare, S. V., Sharma, S. C., Goswami, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-09-2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:. The cumulative yields of various fission products in 232 Th(n, f) with average neutron energies of 6.35, 8.53 and 10.09 MeV have been determined using an off-line -ray spectrometric technique. The neutron beam was produced from the 7 Li(p, n) reaction. From the cumulative fission yields, the mass chain yields were obtained by using charge distribution correction of medium energy. The peak-to-valley ( ) ratio, the average value of light mass ( ), heavy mass ( ) and the average number of neutrons ( ) at the three different neutron energies of the present work and at other energies from the literature in the 232 Th(n, f) reaction were obtained from the mass yield data. The present and the existing literature data in the 232 Th(n, f) reaction at various excitation energies were compared with similar data in the 238 U(n, f) reaction. The fine structure in the mass yield distribution was interpreted from the point of nuclear structure effect such as shell closure proximity and even-odd effect. The role of standard I and standard II asymmetric mode of fission was discussed. The different types of mass-yield distributions between 232 Th(n, f) and 238 U(n, f) reactions were explained from different types of the potential energy between the two fissioning systems. The role of excitation energy was also investigated.
ISSN:1434-6001
1434-601X
DOI:10.1140/epja/i2014-14144-4