Other Questions That Count: Introductory Comments on Assessing Significance in Historical Archaeology

It may be observed that the treatment of historic sites in federally-mandated historic preservation programs does not do justice to those resources. Indeed, the review and compliance procedure is inconsistent and at times capricious in dealing with archaeological sites of the Historic period. Accord...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Historical archaeology Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 10 - 13
Main Authors: Lees, William B., Noble, Vergil E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bethlehem, Pa Society for Historical Archaeology 01-01-1990
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It may be observed that the treatment of historic sites in federally-mandated historic preservation programs does not do justice to those resources. Indeed, the review and compliance procedure is inconsistent and at times capricious in dealing with archaeological sites of the Historic period. Accordingly, so that the intent and purpose of historic preservation legislation can be fully realized, affirmative steps must be taken to correct present deficiencies in the system. Toward that end, a symposium was held at the 1987 Society for Historical Archaeology meetings in order to identify some of the problems inherent in the historic preservation process and seek their resolution. This paper discusses some of the issues that were articulated in the day-long symposium and introduces four papers selected from among the 13 formal contributions; commentary by Douglas Scott follows presentation of the papers.
ISSN:0440-9213
2328-1103
DOI:10.1007/BF03374124