Similarities and Differences between LaNiO 2 and CaCuO 2 and Implications for Superconductivity

The recent observation of superconductivity in hole-doped NdNiO2 has generated considerable attention. The similarities and differences between this infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates are still an open question. To address this issue we derive, via-principles calculations, essential facts relate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review. X Vol. 10; no. 1
Main Authors: Botana, A. S., Norman, M. R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States American Physical Society 04-02-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The recent observation of superconductivity in hole-doped NdNiO2 has generated considerable attention. The similarities and differences between this infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates are still an open question. To address this issue we derive, via-principles calculations, essential facts related to the electronic structure and magnetism of R NiO2 (R = La , Nd) in comparison to their cuprate analog CaCuO2. From this detailed comparison, we find that R NiO2 are promising as cuprate analogs. Besides the much larger d-p energy splitting, and the presence of R 5d states near the Fermi energy in the parent compound, all other electronic-structure parameters seem to be favorable in the context of superconductivity as inferred from the cuprates. In particular, the large value of the longer-range hopping t' and the eg energy splitting are similar to those obtained in cuprates. Doping further acts to increase the cupratelike character of these nickelates by suppressing the self-doping effect of the R 5d bands.
Bibliography:AC02-06CH11357
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) (SC-22). Materials Sciences & Engineering Division
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States)
ISSN:2160-3308
2160-3308
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011024