Prioritising of Retinal Diseases During Covid-19 Outbreak

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine a management strategy for patients with retinal diseases to minimise the potential risk of visual impairment due to the postponement of treatments and visits during the lockdown for COVID-19. Methods: Records of all patients who had rescheduled for ret...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dicle tıp dergisi Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 211 - 219
Main Authors: ERBAHÇECİ TİMUR, İnci Elif, UĞURLU, Nagihan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Diyarbakir Dicle University 12-06-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine a management strategy for patients with retinal diseases to minimise the potential risk of visual impairment due to the postponement of treatments and visits during the lockdown for COVID-19. Methods: Records of all patients who had rescheduled for retina appointments from March 20, 2020, to June 1, 2020, were identified to evaluate the details regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before the COVID-19 pandemic (V0 visit) and at the first visit after lockdown (V1 visit); primary diagnosis, duration of postponement (weeks), change in Snellen line and intravitreal injection (IVI) requirement were recorded. Patients were rescheduled according to our diagnosis-based triage practice pattern; emergency, Group 1; urgent, Group 2; routine, Group 3; and elective, Group 4. BCVA, loss of Snellen line, IVI requirement, and duration of postponement were compared between V0 and V1 visits. In addition, BCVA, change in Snellen line, and the relationship between loss in Snellen line and duration of postponement was evaluated in intravitreally injected patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Results: A total of 1,383 eyes of 763 patients were recruited in this study. The difference in BCVA at V0 visit was statistically significant among the groups and better in Group 4 (p
ISSN:1300-2945
1308-9889
DOI:10.5798/dicletip.1313332