Quality control of small animal PET scanner: The Brazilian Scenario

This work aims to evaluate the quality control program for small animal PET (positron emission tomography) scanners in Brazil. A questionnaire focused on type of small animal PET scanner and quality assurance program was prepared and sent to all Brazilian preclinical molecular imaging services that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences Vol. 8; no. 2
Main Authors: Gadelha Gontijo, Rodrigo Modesto, Ferreira, Andréa Vidal, Silva, Juliana Batista, Mamede, Marcelo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR) 30-06-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This work aims to evaluate the quality control program for small animal PET (positron emission tomography) scanners in Brazil. A questionnaire focused on type of small animal PET scanner and quality assurance program was prepared and sent to all Brazilian preclinical molecular imaging services that participated in the first Brazilian microPET/SPECT/CT users meeting held at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. The answers were compiled and descriptive statistic was applied. There are six preclinical molecular imaging services using PET scanner in Brazil. Five are in the southeastern region and one in the southern region. All services have a single PET device, but most of them have hybrids modalities with CT (computed tomography) and/or SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography). All services have knowledge of the NEMA NU 4-2008 publication specific to small animal PET equipments. However, most of them do not have a quality assurance program in place for their imaging systems. There are few preclinical PET devices installed in Brazil and most of them are located at southeastern region. Regardless the absence of quality assurance program in many of the services, there is a consensus on the importance of quality control program implementation.
ISSN:2319-0612
2319-0612
DOI:10.15392/bjrs.v8i2.1196