Impact of Deep Learning Auto Segmentation Accuracy on Duodenal Dose-Volume Parameters for Pancreas SBRT Patients Treated with MR-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy

The time efficiency of online adaptive radiotherapy in the abdomen can be challenged by long contour editing times. However, as the time consumed to manually edit contours with high precision increases, the less reliable the contours become due to intrafraction motion. We investigate here the impact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. e616 - e617
Main Authors: Conlin, R., Amjad, A., Zhang, Y., Erickson, B.A., Hall, W.A., Sarosiek, C., Zarenia, M., Paulson, E.S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-10-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The time efficiency of online adaptive radiotherapy in the abdomen can be challenged by long contour editing times. However, as the time consumed to manually edit contours with high precision increases, the less reliable the contours become due to intrafraction motion. We investigate here the impact of deep learning auto segmentation (DLAS) accuracy on duodenal dose-volume results in pancreas SBRT patients to determine what level of contour accuracy is required for MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgOART). Nine pancreas SBRT patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac were included in this study. Two research DLAS models, DLAS_1 and DLAS_2, were used to segment the duodenum on daily fat-suppressed btFE images for each of the 9 patients. Manually drawn contours were used as ground truth (GT). Geometric metrics, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA), were used to determine contour accuracy. Dosimetric parameters, D0.03cc, D0.5cc, D2.0cc, and D5.0cc, were used to evaluate dose differences in the duodenum from DLAS_1 and DLAS_2 with the delivered plan. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to determine if significant dose differences existed between the DLAS and reference contours. A Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between dose differences, ΔD0.03cc, ΔD0.5cc, ΔD2.0cc, and ΔD5.0cc, and geometric metrics. DLAS_2 demonstrated significantly better accuracy than DLAS_1 with average DSC and MDA of (0.73, 0.57, p = 0.0001) and (4.23, 9.01, p = 0.02), respectively. The Wilcoxon test revealed no significant dose differences between the dosimetric parameters obtained from the DLAS and reference contours (Table 1). A Spearman correlation between geometric metrics and ΔD revealed a correlation between DSC and ΔD0.03cc (r = -0.73, p = 0.03) and MDA and ΔD0.03cc (r = 0.73, p = 0.03) for DLAS_1 (Table 1). Highly precise manual editing of duodenal contours may not be required for larger volume dose results used to evaluate pancreas SBRT plans during MRgOART. However, in regions of steep dose gradients, inaccurate contours may affect D0.03cc results.
ISSN:0360-3016
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.1357