Identifying culturally insensitive tests, stimuli, and assessment practices in neuropsychology: A survey of professionals and trainees

• Published in: Clinical neuropsychologist pp. 1 - 20
• Main Authors: Wong, Christina G, Arastu, Sana F, Ng, Rowena
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 18-09-2024
• Subjects: cross-cultural neuropsychology; assessment; diversity; Culturally-competent practice; multiculturalism; advocacy
• ISSN: 1385-4046; 1744-4144; 1744-4144
• DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2405064

Identify culturally insensitive tests and assessment practices based on a survey of neuropsychologists and neuropsychology trainees.
A survey was distributed to neuropsychology and psychology listservs asking for respondents to report tests, stimuli, and/or assessment practices perceived as being culturally insensitive and for which populations. A total of 100 participants provided responses, which were coded by three raters to identify commonly reported themes. Frequencies of themes (i.e. different issues related to culturally insensitive tests and practices) and how often specific tests were reported as culturally insensitive were determined.
Lack of exposure due to items being biased toward U.S./Westernized culture or being unfamiliar based on age cohort, regional differences, and language background was the most commonly reported theme (20.1%), followed by tests and stimuli that were considered to be triggering or culturally offensive (17.4%). Among responses that mentioned specific tests, the Boston Naming Test was most frequently reported (43.2%), followed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Verbal subtests (20.3%), and Story B from the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV Logical Memory subtest (10.1%).
Beyond the Boston Naming Test noose item, which was recently replaced, survey respondents identified several other culturally insensitive tests and assessment practices that may negatively impact an examinee's performance and their assessment experience. These results emphasize the need for more research to inform test revisions, updated normative data, and increased consideration for cultural differences to provide more equitable neuropsychological assessment services.