Comparative analysis of frameworks using TypeScript to build server applications
The subject of the research was a comparative analysis of programming frameworks that are intended for building applications. NestJS (version 8.1.1), FoalTS (version 2.5.0) and Ts.ED (version 6.69.1) were put together. An experiment was prepared based on scenarios that focused on the response time o...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of Computer Sciences Institute Vol. 23; pp. 128 - 134 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lublin University of Technology
30-06-2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The subject of the research was a comparative analysis of programming frameworks that are intended for building applications. NestJS (version 8.1.1), FoalTS (version 2.5.0) and Ts.ED (version 6.69.1) were put together. An experiment was prepared based on scenarios that focused on the response time of applications to requests. Each of them had the same set of functionalities. NestJS turned out to be the most efficient of the compared skeletons. It achieved the best results. The worst results in each scenario were achieved by Ts.ED, especially with higher loads. The biggest differences in the comparison can be seen in studies conducted according to a scenario based on GET-type requests, and in particular with more objects in response. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2544-0764 2544-0764 |
| DOI: | 10.35784/jcsi.2910 |