CT Quantification of Interstitial Lung Abnormality and Interstitial Lung Disease: From Technical Challenges to Future Directions

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a variety of lung disorders with varying degrees of inflammation or fibrosis, requiring a combination of clinical, imaging, and pathologic data for evaluation. Imaging is essential for the noninvasive diagnosis of the disease, as well as for assessing dise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Investigative radiology
Main Authors: Choe, Jooae, Hwang, Hye Jeon, Lee, Sang Min, Yoon, Jihye, Kim, Namkug, Seo, Joon Beom
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 16-07-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a variety of lung disorders with varying degrees of inflammation or fibrosis, requiring a combination of clinical, imaging, and pathologic data for evaluation. Imaging is essential for the noninvasive diagnosis of the disease, as well as for assessing disease severity, monitoring its progression, and evaluating treatment response. However, traditional visual assessments of ILD with computed tomography (CT) suffer from reader variability. Automated quantitative CT offers a more objective approach by using computer-based analysis to consistently evaluate and measure ILD. Advancements in technology have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of these measurements. Recently, interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs), which represent potential preclinical ILD incidentally found on CT scans and are characterized by abnormalities in over 5% of any lung zone, have gained attention and clinical importance. The challenge lies in the accurate and consistent identification of ILA, given that its definition relies on a subjective threshold, making quantitative tools crucial for precise ILA evaluation. This review highlights the state of CT quantification of ILD and ILA, addressing clinical and research disparities while emphasizing how machine learning or deep learning in quantitative imaging can improve diagnosis and management by providing more accurate assessments, and finally, suggests the future directions of quantitative CT in this area.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-9996
1536-0210
1536-0210
DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001103