Hyperdense artery sign, symptomatic infarct swelling and effect of alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke

BackgroundAlteplase improves functional outcomes of patients with acute ischaemic stroke, but its effects on symptomatic infarct swelling, an adverse complication of stroke and the influence of CT hyperdense artery sign (HAS) are unclear. This substudy of the Third International Stroke Trial aimed t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke and vascular neurology Vol. 6; no. 2; pp. 238 - 243
Main Authors: Wu, Simiao, Mair, Grant, Cohen, Geoff, Morris, Zoe, von Heijne, Anders, Bradey, Nick, Cala, Lesley, Peeters, Andre, Farrall, Andrew J, Adami, Alessandro, Potter, Gillian, Liu, Ming, Lindley, Richard I, Sandercock, Peter A G, Wardlaw, Joanna M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-06-2021
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundAlteplase improves functional outcomes of patients with acute ischaemic stroke, but its effects on symptomatic infarct swelling, an adverse complication of stroke and the influence of CT hyperdense artery sign (HAS) are unclear. This substudy of the Third International Stroke Trial aimed to investigate the association between HAS and symptomatic infarct swelling and effect of intravenous alteplase on this association.MethodsWe included stroke patients whose prerandomisation scan was non-contrast CT. Raters, masked to clinical information, assessed baseline (prerandomisation) and follow-up (24–48 hours postrandomisation) CT scans for HAS, defined as an intracranial artery appearing denser than contralateral arteries. Symptomatic infarct swelling was defined as clinically significant neurological deterioration ≤7 days after stroke with radiological evidence of midline shift, effacement of basal cisterns or uncal herniation.ResultsAmong 2961 patients, HAS presence at baseline was associated with higher risk of symptomatic infarct swelling (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.42 to 3.44). Alteplase increased the risk of swelling (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.57), with no difference between patients with and those without baseline HAS (p=0.49). In patients with baseline HAS, alteplase reduced the proportion with HAS at follow-up (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91), where HAS disappearance was associated with reduced risk of swelling (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.47).ConclusionAlthough alteplase was associated with increased risk of symptomatic infarct swelling in patients with or without baseline HAS, it was also associated with accelerated clearance of HAS, which in return reduced swelling, providing further mechanistic insights to underpin the benefits of alteplase.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2059-8688
2059-8696
2059-8696
DOI:10.1136/svn-2020-000569