Value of clinical factors in selecting postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis for bone densitometry

OBJECTIVE Criteria to decide which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be examined by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) are currently not available. The rheumatologists from Amsterdam have proposed preliminary criteria based on clinical risk factors (age, disease activity, and functi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 60; no. 8; pp. 799 - 801
Main Authors: Nolla, J M, Fiter, J, Gómez-Vaquero, C, Alegre, J J, Valverde, J, Roig-Escofet, D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01-08-2001
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE Criteria to decide which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be examined by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) are currently not available. The rheumatologists from Amsterdam have proposed preliminary criteria based on clinical risk factors (age, disease activity, and functional status). These criteria are preliminary and not widely accepted but might be helpful in practice. The value of the proposal in a group of Spanish postmenopausal women with RA is analysed. METHODS DXA (lumbar spine and femoral neck) was performed in 128 patients recruited from a clinical setting, and the proposed criteria were applied. T and Z scores were established for a Spanish reference population. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the patients was 61.3 (10.7) and mean duration of the postmenopausal period 14.5 (10.1) years. Mean duration of RA was 13.7 (7.7) years. Mean C reactive protein was 22 (21) mg/l; mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate 26 (18) mm/1st h; and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire score 1.25 (0.79). Ninety (70%) patients fulfilled the proposed criteria. Their sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis (T score ⩽−2.5 SD) was 86% and their specificity, 43%. Positive predictive value was 54% and negative predictive value, 79%. CONCLUSIONS The proposed criteria seem a good screening method for the selection of those patients with RA whose bone mineral density should be assessed as the sensitivity and negative predictive value are acceptable.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-2ZX7CWC7-N
local:annrheumdis;60/8/799
PMID:11454646
istex:91369187D473A2B4A13482BC44216071765A9E3C
href:annrheumdis-60-799.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.60.8.799