Need for recovery after work and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a working population

• Published in: Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 60; no. suppl 1; pp. i83 - i87
• Main Authors: van Amelsvoort, L G P M, Kant, IJ, Bültmann, U, Swaen, G M H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-06-2003; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Group
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology; Cohort analysis; CVD; Disease risk; Educational levels; Exhaustion; Fatigue; Female; General Health Questionnaire; GHQ; Health risks; Humans; JCQ; Job Content Questionnaire; Job stress; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Mortality; Myocardial infarction; need for recovery; Occupational Medicine - statistics & numerical data; Occupational stress; Predictive Value of Tests; Psychological stress; Questionnaires; Recovery of Function; relative risk; Risk Factors; Shift work; Sleep; Stress; Work environment; Work environments; Working conditions
• ISSN: 1351-0711; 1470-7926
• DOI: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i83

Background: A high need for recovery after work can be regarded as a short term adverse effect of working day stressors and the person’s inability to cope and recover. Consequently, it might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Aim: To investigate, in a longitudinal study, the relation between need for recovery and subsequent CVD. Methods: Data from the Maastricht Cohort Study of 12 140 workers were used, with 42 incident self reported CVD cases during 32 months of follow up. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate age, gender, smoking status, and educational level adjusted relative risks. Results: The adjusted relative CVD risk for the second compared to the first tertile of the need for recovery score was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.49 to 3.04), and for the third compared to the first tertile was 3.16 (95% CI: 1.34 to 7.48). When need for recovery was entered as continuous score, an adjusted relative risk per SD increase of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15 to 2.03) was found. Additional adjustment for several work related factors as job demands, did not notably change the observed relation between need for recovery and CVD. Moreover, the increased risk for subjects reporting high job demands (1.38 per SD increase; 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.92) decreased substantially after adjustment for need for recovery. Conclusion: The results show that need for recovery is a strong predictor of subsequent cardiovascular disease and might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease.