Effects of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back or neck pain: a register-linkage study of sickness absences and analgesic purchases in an occupational cohort

• Published in: Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 65; no. 3; pp. 179 - 184
• Main Authors: Suoyrjö, H, Hinkka, K, Oksanen, T, Kivimäki, M, Klaukka, T, Pentti, J, Vahtera, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-03-2008; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adult; Analgesics; Analgesics - therapeutic use; Back pain; Back Pain - rehabilitation; Biological and medical sciences; Chronic Disease; Disabilities; Disability pensions; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Diseases of the spine; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Finland; Humans; Local government; Low back pain; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Neck; Neck pain; Neck Pain - rehabilitation; Observational studies; Occupational Diseases - rehabilitation; Pain management; Patient Care Team; Prospective Studies; Registries; Regression Analysis; Risk reduction; Scope of employment; Sick Leave; Sickness Impact Profile; Social insurance; Studies; Treatment Outcome; Work Schedule Tolerance; Europe; Finland; United Kingdom > UK; Sweden; Lumbar spine; Low back pain; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Spine disease; Absenteeism; Occupational exposure; Epidemiology; Reduction; Pain; Reeducation; Dorsalgia; Cohort study; Rachialgia; Neck; Multidisciplinary; Consumption; Human; Sickness absence; Striated muscle disease; Chronic; Analgesic; Musculoskeletal disorder; Dorsal spine; Rehabilitation(human); Rehabilitation; Occupational medicine
• ISSN: 1351-0711; 1470-7926
• DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.033753

Objective: To determine the effects of multidisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation for chronic back or neck pain on sickness absences and analgesic purchases. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: 10 towns in Finland. Participants: 34 838 local government employees, including 418 participants in rehabilitation for chronic back pain and 195 participants in rehabilitation for chronic neck pain between 1994 and 2002. Main outcome measures: The annual rates of short (1–3 days), long (>3 days), and very long (>21 days) sickness absences and the defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed analgesics. Results: The rate of very long (>21 days) sickness absence among the chronic back pain rehabilitees was 3.03-fold (95% CI 2.55 to 3.60) compared to the non-rehabilitees in the year before rehabilitation. This ratio declined to 1.88 (95% CI 1.65 to 2.37) three years after rehabilitation. No further decline in the rate of very long sickness absence was observed in the subsequent years. For chronic neck pain rehabilitees, no evidence of the effectiveness of rehabilitation on sickness absence was found. In relation to consumption of analgesics, the mean rate of DDDs declined among the back and neck pain rehabilitees after rehabilitation compared to the non-rehabilitees. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation for chronic back pain may decrease the risk of very long sickness absence for three years. In relation to rehabilitation for chronic neck pain, no changes in sickness absences were found.