Prediction of atrial fibrillation using a home blood pressure monitor with a high-resolution system

• Published in: Open heart Vol. 9; no. 2; p. e002006
• Main Authors: Hiyoshi, Yasunaga, Hashimoto, Hidenobu, Kabuki, Takayuki, Toda, Mikihito, Sakurada, Harumizu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Cardiovascular Society 01-09-2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Accuracy; Arrhythmias and Sudden Death; Asymptomatic; atrial fibrillation; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis; Blood pressure; Blood Pressure Monitors; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiovascular disease; Electrocardiography; electronic health records; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Ischemia; Lighting; Monitoring systems; Pacemakers; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sinuses; Stroke; United Kingdom > UK; Japan; atrial fibrillation; electronic health records; electrocardiography
• ISSN: 2053-3624; 2398-595X; 2053-3624
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002006

ObjectiveThe usefulness of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) using several home blood pressure (BP) monitors has been reported. We evaluated the accuracy of a high-resolution system (HiRS) for AF prediction and its usefulness when installed in home BP monitors.MethodsIn patients with paroxysmal, persistent or permanent AF, ECG recording and BP measurements were performed simultaneously. The relationship between ECG rhythm diagnosis and pulse irregularity recognition, using a home BP monitor with HiRS, was investigated. The severity of a pulse disturbance during BP measurement was displayed as an irregular pulse rhythm symbol (IPRS) in three instances. The IPRS was not displayed if the pulse was regular, turned on if there was a weak variation in the pulse, and blinked if there was a strong variation in the pulse.ResultsOne hundred and seven patients (44 paroxysmal AF, 63 persistent or permanent AF) were enrolled, and a total of 333 recordings were analysed. The rhythms recorded by each ECG were 73 sinus regular rhythms, 35 extrasystoles, 222 AFs and 3 atrial flutters. Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of any arrhythmia by the IPRS display of the BP monitor were 95.8% (95% CI 92.6% to 97.6%) and 96.8% (95% CI 92.6% to 100%), respectively. In addition, sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of AF were 100% (95% CI 97.5% to 100%) and 74.8% (95% CI 65.6% to 82.5%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of AF by the IPRS blinking display were 88.3% (95% CI 83.3% to 92.2%) and 94.6% (95% CI 88.6% to 98.0%%), respectively. IPRS exhibited lighting or blinking during AF occurrence; however, during sinus rhythm, IPRS was not displayed in 72 out of 73 recordings.ConclusionThe IPRS device predicted AF with precision and may be particularly useful for predicting an arrhythmia attack in patients with paroxysmal AF.