Cost effectiveness of detecting Barrett's cancer

BACKGROUND: Screening Barrett's oesophagus is controversial owing to a large variation in the reported incidence of neoplastic change and lack of evidence that screening improves tumour prognosis. AIMS: To determine the incidence of Barrett's cancer, its cost of detection, and stage of dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 574 - 579
Main Authors: Wright, T A, Gray, M R, Morris, A I, Gilmore, I T, Ellis, A, Smart, H L, Myskow, M, Nash, J, Donnelly, R J, Kingsnorth, A N
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01-10-1996
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: Screening Barrett's oesophagus is controversial owing to a large variation in the reported incidence of neoplastic change and lack of evidence that screening improves tumour prognosis. AIMS: To determine the incidence of Barrett's cancer, its cost of detection, and stage of disease at time of diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from our surveillance programme have been reviewed to assess the incidence of malignant change, tumour stage at diagnosis, and the cost per cancer detected. RESULTS: 166 patients had annual endoscopic surveillance. Six patients (five men) developed cancer-an incidence of one cancer per 59 male and 167 female patient-years of follow up. The screened group had a significantly earlier stage than a control group of unscreened cancers (p < 0.05). The cost of detecting one cancer was Pounds 14 868 for men and Pounds 42 084 for women. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of screening for Barrett's cancer is high but may be justified on the basis of the high incidence of detecting early stage disease.
Bibliography:istex:736C420A65F45EFD0B1F1C88416C7CD5C5758386
PMID:8944568
local:gutjnl;39/4/574
ark:/67375/NVC-VH0KNGRQ-R
href:gutjnl-39-574.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.39.4.574