Industry payments to family medicine residents in Portugal: a descriptive analysis of the national transparency database

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 13; no. 8; p. e074619
• Main Authors: Ruivo, Marta, Cossutta, Fabrizio, Moreira Fonseca, Nuno
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 29-08-2023; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Annual reports; Corporate sponsorship; Curricula; Funding; Learning activities; Medical education; MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; Medical Education and Training; MEDICAL ETHICS; Medicine; Meetings; Pharmaceutical industry; Primary Care; United States > US; Portugal
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074619

ObjectiveTo analyse payments made to family medicine residents by the pharmaceutical industry during their residency in Portugal, using mandatory disclosure data.Design and participantsCohort study of residents starting their family medicine training in 2015, using data collected from the public national transparency database (Plataforma de Comunicações Transparência e Publicidade). Payments were categorised into six groups, including scientific meetings, educational activities, travel allowances, fees, gifts and undetermined.Main outcome measuresNumber of payments and the total value received by family medicine residents during their training period; number of payments according to their nature (six categories); number of payments and total value by paying entity.ResultsWe analysed data of 457 family medicine residents. A total of 2790 payments were made to 424 (92.8%) residents, amounting to €826 271.14. Thirty-three residents did not receive any payment. The median number of payments per resident was 5 and the median amount received per resident was €1309.51. Residents who ranked in the top 25%, according to value received, were subsidised more than €2500.90 over the course of their residency. This subset of residents received 59.1% of the total amount disbursed in payments. Payments were primarily for attending scientific meetings (80.9%) and educational activities (17.1%). The top 10 paying entities accounted for 69.2% of the total amount paid.ConclusionPharmaceutical industry funding for family medicine residents was highly prevalent, raising concerns over industry influence on medical education, while payment distribution was heterogeneous.