Using reaction time and co-contraction to differentiate acquired (secondary) from functional ‘fixed’ dystonia

Notably, the individual data on RT and co-contraction show clear overlap between the two groups. [...]even if these two parameters can be useful to differentiate at a group level, they are not suitable in this form as diagnostic criteria. [...]we did not find a pattern of response that was abnormal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 86; no. 8; pp. 933 - 934
Main Authors: Macerollo, A, Batla, A, Kassavetis, P, Parees, I, Bhatia, K P, Edwards, M J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01-08-2015
BMJ Publishing Group
Series:Letter
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Notably, the individual data on RT and co-contraction show clear overlap between the two groups. [...]even if these two parameters can be useful to differentiate at a group level, they are not suitable in this form as diagnostic criteria. [...]we did not find a pattern of response that was abnormal in a different manner to AD (eg, failure to activate the muscles requested), which would have allowed a more positive differentiation of FD from AD.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
AM and AB contributed equally.
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309040