Using reaction time and co-contraction to differentiate acquired (secondary) from functional ‘fixed’ dystonia
Notably, the individual data on RT and co-contraction show clear overlap between the two groups. [...]even if these two parameters can be useful to differentiate at a group level, they are not suitable in this form as diagnostic criteria. [...]we did not find a pattern of response that was abnormal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 86; no. 8; pp. 933 - 934 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
01-08-2015
BMJ Publishing Group |
Series: | Letter |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Notably, the individual data on RT and co-contraction show clear overlap between the two groups. [...]even if these two parameters can be useful to differentiate at a group level, they are not suitable in this form as diagnostic criteria. [...]we did not find a pattern of response that was abnormal in a different manner to AD (eg, failure to activate the muscles requested), which would have allowed a more positive differentiation of FD from AD. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 AM and AB contributed equally. |
ISSN: | 0022-3050 1468-330X |
DOI: | 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309040 |