“Summary measure” statistic for assessing the outcome of treatment trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

From a clinical perspective, the question should be raised, "Do we want to consider the disability of these patients to be the same by using the AUC summary measure?" Likewise, as the article points out, "Caution is necessary in short trials of 2 or 3 years, as fixed neurological defi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 66; no. 4; pp. 553 - 554
Main Authors: SIMONIAN, NANCY A, MCALLISTER, ARTHUR, LULL, JULIA
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01-04-1999
BMJ Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From a clinical perspective, the question should be raised, "Do we want to consider the disability of these patients to be the same by using the AUC summary measure?" Likewise, as the article points out, "Caution is necessary in short trials of 2 or 3 years, as fixed neurological deficits are accumulating very slowly, and an increased AUC at the end of a trial may simply represent transient disability which has either resolved or has yet to resolve." [...]as stated by Matthews et al, 1-8 the AUC statistic is particularly relevant for summarisingpeak data such as the increase and decrease of disability associated with a relapse.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp.66.4.553