Oral azithromycin versus doxycycline in meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomised double-masked open-label clinical trial

• Published in: British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 99; no. 2; p. 199
• Main Authors: Kashkouli, Mohsen Bahmani, Fazel, Ali Jalili, Kiavash, Victoria, Nojomi, Marzieh, Ghiasian, Leila
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-02-2015
• Subjects: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Azithromycin - adverse effects; Azithromycin - therapeutic use; Double-Blind Method; Doxycycline - adverse effects; Doxycycline - therapeutic use; Eyelid Diseases - diagnosis; Eyelid Diseases - drug therapy; Eyelid Diseases - physiopathology; Female; Humans; Lubricant Eye Drops - administration & dosage; Male; Meibomian Glands - drug effects; Meibomian Glands - pathology; Middle Aged; Tears - physiology; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Eye Lids; Treatment Medical; Inflammation; Microbiology; Ocular Surface
• ISSN: 1468-2079
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305410

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin compared with oral doxycycline in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) who had failed to respond to prior conservative management.
110 patients (>12 years old) with MGD were randomly assigned to receive either oral 5-day azithromycin (500 mg on day 1 and then 250 mg/day) or 1-month doxycycline (200 mg/day). They also continued eyelid warming/cleaning and artificial tears. A score comprising five symptoms and seven signs (primary outcome) was recorded prior to treatment and at 1 week, and 1 and 2 months after treatment. Total score was the sum of both scores at each follow-up. Side effects were recorded and overall clinical improvement was categorised as excellent, good, fair or poor based on the percentage of change in the total score.
Symptoms and signs improved significantly in both groups (p=0.001). While improvement of symptoms was not different between the groups, bulbar conjunctival redness (p=0.004) and ocular surface staining (p=0.01) were significantly better in the azithromycin group. The azithromycin group showed a significantly better overall clinical response (p=0.01). Mild gastrointestinal side effects were not significantly different between the groups except for the second visit, when the doxycycline group had significantly more side effects (p=0.002).
Although both oral azithromycin and doxycycline improved the symptoms of MGD, 5-day oral azithromycin is recommended for its better effect on improving the signs, better overall clinical response and shorter duration of treatment.
NCT01783860.