Circulating T cell status and molecular imaging may predict clinical benefit of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in oral cancer

BackgroundAddition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome.MethodsIn this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated with one dose of 480 mg nivolumab 3 weeks prior to s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal for immunotherapy of cancer Vol. 12; no. 7; p. e009278
Main Authors: Wondergem, Niels E, Miedema, Iris H C, van de Ven, Rieneke, Zwezerijnen, Gerben J C, de Graaf, Pim, Karagozoglu, K Hakki, Hendrickx, Jan-Jaap, Eerenstein, Simone E J, Bun, Rolf J, Mulder, Dorien C, Voortman, Jens, Boellaard, Ronald, Windhorst, Albert D, Hagers, J Pascal, Peferoen, Laura A N, de Gruijl, Tanja D, Bloemena, Elisabeth, Brakenhoff, Ruud H, Leemans, C René, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C Willemien
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 22-07-2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundAddition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome.MethodsIn this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated with one dose of 480 mg nivolumab 3 weeks prior to surgery. Primary objectives were safety, feasibility, and suitability of programmed death receptor ligand-1 positron emission tomography (PD-L1 PET) as a biomarker for response. Imaging included 18F-BMS-986192 (PD-L1) PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET before and after nivolumab treatment. Secondary objectives included clinical and pathological response, and immune profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for response prediction. Baseline tumor biopsies and postnivolumab resection specimens were evaluated by histopathology.ResultsGrade III or higher adverse events were not observed and treatment was not delayed in relation to nivolumab administration and other study procedures. Six patients (38%) had a pathological response, of whom three (19%) had a major (≥90%) pathological response (MPR). Tumor PD-L1 PET uptake (quantified using standard uptake value) was not statistically different in patients with or without MPR (median 5.3 vs 3.4). All major responders showed a significantly postnivolumab decreased signal on FDG PET. PBMC immune phenotyping showed higher levels of CD8+ T cell activation in MPR patients, evidenced by higher baseline expression levels of PD-1, TIGIT, IFNγ and lower levels of PD-L1.ConclusionTogether these data support that neoadjuvant treatment of advanced-stage oral cancers with nivolumab was safe and induced an MPR in a promising 19% of patients. Response was associated with decreased FDG PET uptake as well as activation status of peripheral T cell populations.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
NEW and IHCM contributed equally.
RvdV has received research funding from Genmab BV. TDdG is scientific advisor to Immunicum, GE Health, and Lava Therapeutics, holds stock from LAVA Therapeutics and received research funding from Idera Pharmaceuticals (now Aceragen). RHB received research grants from KWF Kankerbestrijding/Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Center Amsterdam Foundation, ZonMW and NWO, Genmab BV and the Hanarth Foundation and is on the advisory board of Nanobiotix. He has a scientific collaboration with Orfenix BV and Qialix DoT. CRL received research grants from KWF Kankerbestrijding/Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Center Amsterdam Foudation, Genmab BV, BMS and the Hanarth Foundation and is on the advisory board of Merck & Co. CWM-vdHvO received research grants from BMS, Boeringher Ingelheim, GSK, Pfizer and AstraZeneca and consulted for GE Health Care, Novartis and EliLilly. All other authors report no competing interests.
Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-009278).
CRL and CWM-vdHvO contributed equally.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
ISSN:2051-1426
2051-1426
DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-009278