Best practice for the selection, design and implementation of UK Kidney Association guidelines: a modified Delphi consensus approach

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 14; no. 6; p. e085723
• Main Authors: Burton, James O, Chilcot, Joseph, Fielding, Katie, Frankel, Andrew H, Lakhani, Niraj, Nye, Pam, Parker, Kathrine, Priestman, William, Willingham, Fiona
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 18-06-2024; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Agreements; Clinical medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Design; Humans; implementation science; Kidney diseases; Kidney Diseases - therapy; Medical personnel; Nephrology; Nephrology - standards; Patients; Polls & surveys; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Professionals; protocols & guidelines; Renal Medicine; Stakeholders; Surveys and Questionnaires; United Kingdom; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; nephrology; protocols & guidelines; implementation science
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085723

BackgroundDespite research into how to effectively implement evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice, a lack of standardisation in the commissioning and development of clinical practice guidelines can lead to inconsistencies and gaps in implementation. This research aimed to ascertain how topics in kidney care worthy of guideline development within the UK should be chosen, prioritised, designed and implemented.MethodsFollowing a modified Delphi methodology, a multi-disciplinary panel of experts in kidney healthcare from across the UK developed 35 statements on the issues surrounding the selection, development and implementation of nephrology guidelines. Consensus with these statements was determined by agreement using an online survey; the consensus threshold was defined as 75% agreement.Results419 responses were received. Of the 364 healthcare practitioners (HCPs), the majority had over 20 years of experience in their role (n=123) and most respondents were nephrologists (n=95). Of the 55 non-clinical respondents, the majority were people with kidney disease (n=41) and the rest were their carers or family. Participants were from across England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Consensus between HCPs was achieved in 32/35 statements, with 28 statements reaching ≥90% agreement. Consensus between patients and patient representatives was achieved across all 20 statements, with 13/20 reaching ≥90% agreement.ConclusionsThe current results have provided the basis for six recommendations to improve the selection, design and implementation of guidelines. Actioning these recommendations will help improve the accessibility of, and engagement with, clinical guidelines, contributing to the continuing development of best practice in UK kidney care.