Global prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum coinfection in Ixodes tick populations: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 14; no. 6; p. e083052
• Main Authors: Luo, Suyi, Bao, Fukai, Wu, Hanxin, Ma, Weijie, Zhu, Liangyu, Huang, Xun, Yang, Rui, Peng, Li, Gao, Li, Wu, Xinya, Zhong, Lei, Dong, Yan, Li, Bingxue, Ma, Weijiang, Liu, Aihua
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 10-06-2024; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Protocol
• Subjects: Anaplasma phagocytophilum - isolation & purification; Animals; Antibiotics; Antibodies; Arachnids; Borrelia burgdorferi - isolation & purification; Coinfection - epidemiology; Data collection; Ehrlichiosis - epidemiology; Epidemiology; Humans; Infections; Ixodes - microbiology; Lyme disease; Lyme Disease - epidemiology; Meta-Analysis; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Microbiology; Observational studies; Pathogens; Prevalence; Public health; Regional studies; Research Design; Systematic Review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; United States > US; Meta-Analysis; Microbiology; Epidemiology; Systematic Review
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083052

Introduction Ixodes ticks are pivotal in transmitting diseases like Lyme disease and human granulocytic anaplasmosis, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, respectively. These pathogens not only affect humans through single or multiple tick bites but also pose risks to animal hosts, leading to potential coinfections. Despite regional studies indicating significant prevalence, their global coinfection data remain sparse. This study aims to bridge this gap through a systematic review and meta-analysis of B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum coinfections in Ixodes ticks worldwide. Addressing data limitations and study variability, it seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of coinfection patterns, their epidemiological implications and inform targeted prevention strategies.Methods and analysisFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols 2015 guidelines and PROSPERO registration, this study will undertake a thorough database search without constraints on language or publication date, using standardised screening and data extraction protocols. The quality and bias of studies will be evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. In the statistical analysis phase, conducted in R, we will initially determine the use of fixed or random-effects models based on the assessment of data heterogeneity. This choice will guide the framework for subsequent analyses. Within the selected model’s framework, we will perform subgroup analyses and meta-regression to investigate the effects of various factors, ensuring that each step is tailored to the initial model selection to maintain analytical consistency.Ethics and disseminationAs this study does not involve clinical research or data collection from subjects, ethical approval is not required. We will uphold ethical standards in synthesising and reporting data. Study outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals, communicating findings to the scientific community and contributing to the understanding of Ixodes tickborne diseases.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023449735.