How Many Freemasons Are There? The Consensus Voting Mechanism in Metric Spaces
We study the evolution of a social group when admission to the group is determined via consensus or unanimity voting. In each time period, two candidates apply for membership and a candidate is selected if and only if all the current group members agree. We apply the spatial theory of voting where g...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
25-05-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We study the evolution of a social group when admission to the group is
determined via consensus or unanimity voting. In each time period, two
candidates apply for membership and a candidate is selected if and only if all
the current group members agree. We apply the spatial theory of voting where
group members and candidates are located in a metric space and each member
votes for its closest (most similar) candidate. Our interest focuses on the
expected cardinality of the group after $T$ time periods. To evaluate this we
study the geometry inherent in dynamic consensus voting over a metric space.
This allows us to develop a set of techniques for lower bounding and upper
bounding the expected cardinality of a group. We specialize these methods for
two-dimensional metric spaces. For the unit ball the expected cardinality of
the group after $T$ time periods is $\Theta(T^{1/8})$. In sharp contrast, for
the unit square the expected cardinality is at least $\Omega(\ln T)$ but at
most $O(\ln T \cdot \ln\ln T )$. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2005.12505 |