The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure
We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil procedure. Each instance of the dataset consists of a general introduction to the case, a particular question, and a possible solution argument, accompanied by a detailed analysis of why the argument applies in that case. Since...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
05-11-2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil
procedure. Each instance of the dataset consists of a general introduction to
the case, a particular question, and a possible solution argument, accompanied
by a detailed analysis of why the argument applies in that case. Since the
dataset is based on a book aimed at law students, we believe that it represents
a truly complex task for benchmarking modern legal language models. Our
baseline evaluation shows that fine-tuning a legal transformer provides some
advantage over random baseline models, but our analysis reveals that the actual
ability to infer legal arguments remains a challenging open research question. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2211.02950 |