Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate by photoelastic analysis stress distribution on short and long implants of two dental implant systems with 2-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses of 8 mm and 13 mm heights. Sixteen photoelastic models were divided into 4 groups: I: long implant (5×11 ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Dentistry Vol. 2014; no. 2014; pp. 142 - 148
Main Authors: Nóbilo, Mauro Antônio de Arruda, Oliveira Moreira, Ana Regina, Pimentel, Marcele Jardim, Sigua-Rodriguez, Eder Alberto, Figueirêdo, Evandro Portela, de Albergaria-Barbosa, José Ricardo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Limiteds 01-01-2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Hindawi Limited
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to evaluate by photoelastic analysis stress distribution on short and long implants of two dental implant systems with 2-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses of 8 mm and 13 mm heights. Sixteen photoelastic models were divided into 4 groups: I: long implant (5×11 mm) (Neodent), II: long implant (5×11 mm) (Bicon), III: short implant (5×6 mm) (Neodent), and IV: short implants (5×6 mm) (Bicon). The models were positioned in a circular polariscope associated with a cell load and static axial (0.5 Kgf) and nonaxial load (15°, 0.5 Kgf) were applied to each group for both prosthetic crown heights. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare the factors implant length, crown height, and implant system (α=0.05). The results showed that implant length was a statistically significant factor for both axial and nonaxial loading. The 13 mm prosthetic crown did not result in statistically significant differences in stress distribution between the implant systems and implant lengths studied, regardless of load type (P>0.05). It can be concluded that short implants showed higher stress levels than long implants. Implant system and length was not relevant factors when prosthetic crown height were increased.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Academic Editor: Michael E. Razzoog
ISSN:1687-8728
1687-8736
DOI:10.1155/2014/206723