Effects of Patient Preferences on Outcomes in the Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments (PReDICT) Study

Objective:The Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments [PReDICT] study aimed to identify clinical and biological factors predictive of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder among treatment-naive adults. The authors evaluated the efficacy of cognitive-beha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of psychiatry Vol. 174; no. 6; pp. 546 - 556
Main Authors: Dunlop, Boadie W, Kelley, Mary E, Aponte-Rivera, Vivianne, Mletzko-Crowe, Tanja, Kinkead, Becky, Ritchie, James C, Nemeroff, Charles B, Craighead, W. Edward, Mayberg, Helen S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States American Psychiatric Association 01-06-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective:The Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments [PReDICT] study aimed to identify clinical and biological factors predictive of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder among treatment-naive adults. The authors evaluated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and two antidepressant medications (escitalopram and duloxetine) in patients with major depression and examined the moderating effect of patients’ treatment preferences on outcomes.Method:Adults aged 18–65 with treatment-naive major depression were randomly assigned with equal likelihood to 12 weeks of treatment with escitalopram (10–20 mg/day), duloxetine (30–60 mg/day), or CBT (16 50-minute sessions). Prior to randomization, patients indicated whether they preferred medication or CBT or had no preference. The primary outcome was change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), administered by raters blinded to treatment.Results:A total of 344 patients were randomly assigned, with a mean baseline HAM-D score of 19.8 (SD=3.8). The mean estimated overall decreases in HAM-D score did not significantly differ between treatments (CBT: 10.2, escitalopram: 11.1, duloxetine: 11.2). Last observation carried forward remission rates did not significantly differ between treatments (CBT: 41.9%, escitalopram: 46.7%, duloxetine: 54.7%). Patients matched to their preferred treatment were more likely to complete the trial but not more likely to achieve remission.Conclusions:Treatment guidelines that recommend either an evidence-based psychotherapy or antidepressant medication for nonpsychotic major depression can be extended to treatment-naive patients. Treatment preferences among patients without prior treatment exposure do not significantly moderate symptomatic outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript
PReDICT Team: Treating Psychotherapists: Carla Alvarez, Ph.D., Julie Etzel, Ph.D., Rosario Falero, M.D., Ph.D., Maryrose Gerardi, Ph.D., Mary Heekin, LCSW, Meredith Jones, M.A., Noriel Lim, Ph.D., Vivianna Mahoney, Ph.D., Cynthia Ramirez, Ph.D., Sheethal Reddy, Ph.D., Lorie Ritschel, Ph.D., Jill Rosenberg, LCSW, Diana Simeonova, Ph.D., Patrick Sylvers, M.A., and Alexandra Zagoloff, Ph.D. Therapy supervisors: WEC and Linda Wilcoxon Craighead, Ph.D. Treating Physicians: BWD, Nicole Almeida, M.D., VAR, Corey Beck, M.D., Steve Garlow, M.D., Ph.D., Ebrahim Haroon, M.D., Maryann Jacob, M.D., Jeffrey Rakofsky, M.D., Dylan Wint, M.D. Clinical Coordinators: Yara Betancourt, Beatriz Blastos, Ronald Chismar, R.N., Melanie Galanti, Rachelle Gibson, R.N., Lauren Marx, Melissa McKenzie, and Tanja Mletzko Crowe.
ISSN:0002-953X
1535-7228
DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050517