The utilization of the double focal transformation for sparse data representation and data reconstruction

• Published in: Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 64; no. 6; pp. 1498 - 1515
• Main Authors: Kutscha, H., Verschuur, D.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Houten Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-11-2016; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Aliasing; Coarse sampling; Inverse problem; Mathematical models; Noise; Noise attenuation; Operators; Propagation; Reconstruction; Seismic studies; Seismics; Sparse inversion; Transformations; Wave propagation
• ISSN: 0016-8025; 1365-2478
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12362

ABSTRACT
In many cases, seismic measurements are coarsely sampled in at least one dimension. This leads to aliasing artefacts and therefore to problems in the subsequent processing steps. To avoid this, seismic data reconstruction can be applied in advance. The success and reliability of reconstruction methods are dependent on the assumptions they make on the data. In many cases, wavefields are assumed to (locally) have a linear space–time behaviour. However, field data are usually complex, with strongly curved events. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the double focal transformation as an efficient way for complex data reconstruction. Hereby, wavefield propagation is formulated as a transformation, where one‐way propagation operators are used as its basis functions. These wavefield operators can be based on a macro velocity model, which allows our method to use prior information in order to make the data decomposition more effective. The basic principle of the double focal transformation is to focus seismic energy along source and receiver coordinates simultaneously. The seismic data are represented by a number of localized events in the focal domain, whereas aliasing noise spreads out. By imposing a sparse solution in the focal domain, aliasing noise is suppressed, and data reconstruction beyond aliasing is achieved. To facilitate the process, only a few effective depth levels need to be included, preferably along the major boundaries in the data, from which the propagation operators can be calculated. Results on 2D and 3D synthetic data illustrate the method's virtues. Furthermore, seismic data reconstruction on a 2D field dataset with gaps and aliased source spacing demonstrates the strength of the double focal transformation, particularly for near‐offset reflections with strong curvature and for diffractions.