Rethinking Environmental Contributions to Child and Adolescent Psychopathology A Meta-Analysis of Shared Environmental Influences
Behavioral genetic research has concluded that the more important environmental influences result in differences between siblings (referred to as nonshared ; e 2 ), whereas environmental influences that create similarities between siblings (referred to as shared ; c 2 ) are indistinguishable from ze...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological bulletin Vol. 135; no. 4; pp. 608 - 637 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, DC
American Psychological Association
01-07-2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Behavioral genetic research has concluded that the more important environmental influences result in differences between siblings (referred to as
nonshared
;
e
2
), whereas environmental influences that create similarities between siblings (referred to as
shared
;
c
2
) are indistinguishable from zero. However, there is mounting evidence that during childhood and adolescence,
c
2
may make important contributions to most forms of psychopathology. The aim of the meta-analysis was to empirically confirm this hypothesis. The author examined twin and adoption studies (
n
= 490) of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology prior to adulthood. Analyses revealed that
c
2
accounted for 10%-19% of the variance within conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety, depression, and broad internalizing and externalizing disorders, regardless of their operationalization. When age, informant, and sex effects were considered,
c
2
generally ranged from 10%-30% of the variance. Importantly,
c
2
estimates did not vary across twin and adoption studies, suggesting that these estimates reflect actual environmental influences common to siblings. The only exception was attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, which appeared to be largely genetic (and particularly nonadditive genetic) in origin. Conceptual, methodological, and clinical implications of these findings are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
DOI: | 10.1037/a0015702 |