Beyond Valence in the Perception of Likelihood The Role of Emotion Specificity

Positive and negative moods have been shown to increase likelihood estimates of future events matching these states in valence (e.g., E. J. Johnson & A. Tversky, 1983 ). In the present article, 4 studies provide evidence that this congruency bias (a) is not limited to valence but functions in an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 397 - 416
Main Authors: DeSteno, David, Petty, Richard E, Wegener, Duane T, Rucker, Derek D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Psychological Association 01-03-2000
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Positive and negative moods have been shown to increase likelihood estimates of future events matching these states in valence (e.g., E. J. Johnson & A. Tversky, 1983 ). In the present article, 4 studies provide evidence that this congruency bias (a) is not limited to valence but functions in an emotion-specific manner, (b) derives from the informational value of emotions, and (c) is not the inevitable outcome of likelihood assessment under heightened emotion. Specifically, Study 1 demonstrates that sadness and anger, 2 distinct, negative emotions, differentially bias likelihood estimates of sad and angering events. Studies 2 and 3 replicate this finding in addition to supporting an emotion-as-information (cf. N. Schwarz & G. L. Clore, 1983 ), as opposed to a memory-based, mediating process for the bias. Finally, Study 4 shows that when the source of the emotion is salient, a reversal of the bias can occur given greater cognitive effort aimed at accuracy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-3
ISSN:0022-3514
1939-1315
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397