Homology Modeling of Human Uridine-5′-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 Reveals Insights into Factors Influencing Substrate and Cosubstrate Binding
The elimination of numerous endogenous compounds and xenobiotics via glucuronidation by uridine-5′-diphosphate glycosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is an essential process of the body’s chemical defense system. UGTs have distinct but overlapping substrate preferences, but the molecular basis for their...
Saved in:
Published in: | ACS omega Vol. 5; no. 12; pp. 6872 - 6887 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
American Chemical Society
31-03-2020
|
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The elimination of numerous endogenous compounds and xenobiotics via glucuronidation by uridine-5′-diphosphate glycosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is an essential process of the body’s chemical defense system. UGTs have distinct but overlapping substrate preferences, but the molecular basis for their substrate specificity remains poorly understood. Three-dimensional protein structures can greatly enhance our understanding of the interactions between enzymes and their substrates, but because of the inherent difficulties in purifying and crystallizing integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane proteins, no complete mammalian UGT structure has yet been produced. To address this problem, we have created a homology model of UGT1A6 using I-TASSER to explore, in detail, the interactions of human UGT1A6 with its substrates. Ligands were docked into our model in the presence of the cosubstrate uridine-5′-diphosphate-glucuronic acid, interacting residues were examined, and poses were compared to those cocrystallized with various plant and bacterial glycosyltransferases (GTs). Our model structurally resembles other GTs, and docking experiments replicated many of the expected UGT-substrate interactions. Some bias toward the template structures’ protein–substrate interactions and binding preferences was evident. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2470-1343 2470-1343 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acsomega.0c00205 |