Predictive accuracy of temperature-nitrate relationships for the oceanic mixed layer of the New Zealand region

Nitrate concentrations are a major factor controlling phytoplankton growth, hence the recent interest in using remotely sensed sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll concentrations (Chla) to infer nitrate concentrations and substantially improve spatiotemporal estimates of nitrate in the surf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research - Oceans Vol. 112; no. C6; pp. C06010 - n/a
Main Authors: Sherlock, V., Pickmere, S., Currie, K., Hadfield, M., Nodder, S., Boyd, P. W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Geophysical Union 01-06-2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nitrate concentrations are a major factor controlling phytoplankton growth, hence the recent interest in using remotely sensed sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll concentrations (Chla) to infer nitrate concentrations and substantially improve spatiotemporal estimates of nitrate in the surface ocean. Regression models which predict mixed‐layer nitrate concentrations as a function of temperature and climatological salinity are derived for the subtropical and subantarctic waters of the New Zealand region (30°–50°S, 154°E–160°W). These models are then validated using independent in situ measurements of temperature and nitrate concentrations and remotely sensed SST and Chla. Root mean square (RMS) nitrate prediction errors vary with water mass and exhibit seasonally dependent biases. RMS errors range from 0.8 to 1.8 μM in subtropical waters, 1.6 to 1.9 μM in the Subtropical Front, and 1.4 to 2.5 μM in subantarctic waters, depending on the spatiotemporal sampling characteristics of validation data sets. Prediction errors are correlated with observed chlorophyll concentrations, and a linear chlorophyll correction reduces seasonally dependent prediction biases significantly. Nitrate prediction errors for the New Zealand region are comparable with nitrate prediction errors reported for the North Atlantic and Equatorial and North Pacific, and the regression models give a substantially better description of the seasonal variation of nitrate in the New Zealand region than an existing nitrate climatology. A comparison of predicted nitrate‐depletion temperatures with other published studies highlights the importance of detailed regional validation of temperature‐nitrate regression models.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-M66LWM9L-9
istex:0167844A9E213556AA29E5BAD4FB83078AFD96C8
ArticleID:2006JC003562
Tab-delimited Table 1.Tab-delimited Table 2.Tab-delimited Table 3.Tab-delimited Table 4.Tab-delimited Table 5.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9275
2156-2202
2169-9291
DOI:10.1029/2006JC003562