Effects of Rater Accountability on the Accuracy and the Favorability of Performance Ratings

The authors tested the effects of holding raters accountable for their performance ratings on the accuracy and the favorability of those ratings. Undergraduate research participants ( N = 247) completed an inbasket exercise and observed a videotaped simulation during 2 sessions over a 2-week period....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology Vol. 80; no. 4; pp. 517 - 524
Main Authors: Mero, Neal P, Motowidlo, Stephan J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Psychological Association 01-08-1995
American Psychological Association, etc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors tested the effects of holding raters accountable for their performance ratings on the accuracy and the favorability of those ratings. Undergraduate research participants ( N = 247) completed an inbasket exercise and observed a videotaped simulation during 2 sessions over a 2-week period. The simulation presented performance information on 4 simulated subordinates portrayed through videotaped vignettes. True performance scores were manipulated by varying the proportion of positive and negative performance vignettes presented for each subordinate. Participants who were made to feel accountable by having to justify their ratings to the experimenter in writing rated their simulated subordinates more accurately. In another experimental condition, accountable raters who were told their subordinates' previous performance ratings were too low rated their subordinates more favorably than did raters in the same experimental condition who were not accountable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.517