A Tale of Two Methods
The structural equation modeling approach to testing for mediation is compared to the Baron and Kenny approach. The approaches are essentially the same when the hypothesis being tested predicts partial mediation. The approaches differ, however, in how each tests for complete mediation. Disparities i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organizational research methods Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 233 - 244 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Thousand Oaks, CA
Sage Publications
01-04-2006
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The structural equation modeling approach to testing for mediation is compared to the Baron and Kenny approach. The approaches are essentially the same when the hypothesis being tested predicts partial mediation. The approaches differ, however, in how each tests for complete mediation. Disparities in both theory and statistical estimators are identified and discussed. A strategy for future tests of mediation is recommended. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1094-4281 1552-7425 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1094428105285144 |