Controlling factors and effects of chronic nitrogen and sulphur deposition on methane oxidation in a temperate forest soil

Soil CH 4 flux rates were determined on 28 occasions between June 1996 and July 1997 in a temperate deciduous woodland in south-west England. The effects of environmental and edaphic factors on flux rates and the effects of chronic deposition of sulphuric acid, nitric acid and ammonium sulphate were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil biology & biochemistry Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 93 - 102
Main Authors: Bradford, M.A, Wookey, P.A, Ineson, P, Lappin-Scott, H.M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 2001
New York, NY Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Soil CH 4 flux rates were determined on 28 occasions between June 1996 and July 1997 in a temperate deciduous woodland in south-west England. The effects of environmental and edaphic factors on flux rates and the effects of chronic deposition of sulphuric acid, nitric acid and ammonium sulphate were investigated. The soil was a consistent net CH 4 oxidiser, with mean ( n=10) oxidation rates for plots exposed to ambient throughfall ranging from 44.3 to 110.6 μg CH 4 m −2 h −1 between samplings; net CH 4 production was not observed. The annual mean uptake rate differed by only 6% from the annual mean flux calculated from the literature for other studies of >364 d duration in temperate and boreal deciduous woodlands. The CH 4 uptake rates were correlated with soil water potential (square-root transformed), temperature and depth of organic horizon ( r 2=0.78, 0.30 and 0.41, respectively). Soil water potential was the best predictor of net CH 4 oxidation rates and when temperature was added to the regression model no improvement in the r 2 was observed. The chronic deposition of sulphuric acid stimulated net methane oxidation ( P<0.05), while the chronic deposition of nitric acid and ammonium sulphate had no significant effect.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0038-0717
1879-3428
DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00118-8