The Interplay Between Individual and Dyadic/Common Coping in Female Patients With Cancer

• Published in: European journal of psychology open Vol. 80; no. 4; pp. 143 - 151
• Main Authors: Paschali, Antonia, Palli, Alexandra, Thomadakis, Christoforos, Karademas, Evangelos C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hogrefe Publishing 01-12-2021; Verlag Hans Huber; Hogrefe Publishing Group
• Subjects: Adaptation; adaptation to cancer; Coping Behavior; dyadic coping; Dyads; emotional well-being; Emotions; Female; Human; individual coping; Neoplasms; Outpatient; Partners; Patients; Relationship Satisfaction; Well Being; emotional well-being; adaptation to cancer; relationship satisfaction; individual coping; dyadic coping
• ISSN: 2673-8627; 2673-8627
• DOI: 10.1024/2673-8627/a000012

Both individual and dyadic coping behaviors are important for adaptation to a severe illness. However, there is a theoretical controversy regarding the interplay between these two forms of coping. In this cross-sectional study, we examined (a) whether recently diagnosed cancer patients engage mostly with one form of coping or whether they use both in parallel; (b) the relationship of individual and supportive dyadic/common coping to emotional well-being and relationship satisfaction. Participants were 92 women recently diagnosed with cancer (mostly breast cancer) and receiving medical treatment (M
age = 49.37 years; SD = 10.52). All had been living with their partner for at least 2 years. The parallel use of individual and supportive dyadic/common coping behaviors was frequently reported. Individual and dyadic/common coping proved to be related to each other (p < .01), and both were related to emotional well-being and relationship satisfaction (p < .05). The combination of high individual and high supportive dyadic/common coping was associated with greater satisfaction with the relationship (p < .01). Patients probably use individual and dyadic coping behaviors in concert to better deal with the different aspects of their illness experience. Both types of coping should be considered in the context of personalized intervention programs to facilitate adaptation to cancer.