Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Nanoparticles:  A Tool for the Preparation of Well-Defined Hybrid Nanostructures and for Understanding the Chemistry of Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerizations from Surfaces

• Published in: Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 123; no. 31; pp. 7497 - 7505
• Main Authors: von Werne, Timothy, Patten, Timothy E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 08-08-2001
• ISSN: 0002-7863; 1520-5126
• DOI: 10.1021/ja010235q

Structurally well-defined polymer−nanoparticle hybrids were prepared by modifying the surface of silica nanoparticles with initiators for atom transfer radical polymerization and by using these initiator-modified nanoparticles as macroinitiators. Well-defined polymer chains were grown from the nanoparticle surfaces to yield individual particles composed of a silica core and a well-defined, densely grafted outer polystyrene or poly(methyl methacrylate) layer. In both cases, linear kinetic plots, linear plots of molecular weight (M n) versus conversion, increases in hydrodynamic diameter with increasing conversion, and narrow molecular weight distributions (M w/M n) for the grafted polymer samples were observed. Polymerizations of styrene from smaller (75-nm-diameter) silica nanoparticles exhibited good molecular weight control, while polymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA) from the same nanoparticles exhibited good molecular weight control only when a small amount of free initiator was added to the polymerization solution. The difference in polymerization behavior for styrene and MMA was ascribed to the facts that styrene undergoes thermal self-initiation while MMA does not and that termination processes involving freely diffusing chains are faster than those involving surface-bound chains. The polymerizations of both styrene and MMA from larger (300-nm-diameter) silica nanoparticles did not exhibit molecular weight control. This lack of control was ascribed to the very high initial monomer-to-initiator ratio in these polymerizations. Molecular weight control was induced by the addition of a small amount of free initiator to the polymerization but was not induced when 5−15 mol % of deactivator (Cu(II) complex) was added.