Utility of Suspended Solid Measurements for Storm-Water Runoff Treatment

• Published in: Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 134; no. 9; pp. 712 - 721
• Main Authors: Kayhanian, Masoud, Rasa, Ehsan, Vichare, Akshay, Leatherbarrow, Jon E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Reston, VA American Society of Civil Engineers 01-09-2008
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Exact sciences and technology; Natural water pollution; Pollution; Rainwaters, run off water and others; TECHNICAL PAPERS; Water treatment and pollution; Suspended sediment; Correlation; Mixing; Samplings; Runoff water; Sediments; Density; Sedimentation; Particles; Suspended particle; Particle size distribution; Utilities; Correlation analysis; Runoff; Suspended solids; Stormwater management; Best management practice; Sampling; Storm water
• ISSN: 0733-9372; 1943-7870
• DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:9(712)

In this paper alternative solutions are presented to solve problems associated with the measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) in storm-water runoff. Results revealed that the accuracy of TSS measurement is largely related to sample representativeness, particle size distribution (PSD), sampling pipette position, and sample mixing. In general, when the PSD in the runoff was mostly larger than
75
μm
, the most accurate and reproducible results were obtained when samples were collected from a position of mid-depth and midway between the walls of the beaker and the vortex and mixed at speeds in the range of
600–700
rpm
. For runoff samples with a PSD smaller than
75
μm
, mixing at a higher rpm is not a significant factor. As long as the PSD in the TSS subsample is representative of the original sample, a strong correlation between TSS and suspended solid concentration can be achieved. The results showed that density was largely correlated with the organic content of the particles, and, in general, smaller particles tended to have a lower density. The density results revealed that assuming a single sand size density of
2.6
g∕
cm3
for storm-water runoff produced a large error in the computation of sediment load and particle settling velocity.