Biodiversity of Freshwater Diatom Communities during 1000 Years of Metal Mining, Land Use, and Climate Change in Central Sweden

• Published in: Environmental science & technology Vol. 46; no. 16; pp. 9097 - 9105
• Main Authors: De Laender, F, Verschuren, D, Bindler, R, Thas, O, Janssen, C.R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC American Chemical Society 21-08-2012
• Subjects: Algae; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Biodiversity; Biological and medical sciences; Climate Change; Diatoms - classification; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution; Environmental science; Fresh Water; Fresh water environment; Freshwater ecology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Land use; Metals; Mining; Sweden; Sweden; Europe; Dynamical climatology; Mining; Freshwater environment; Heterokontophyta; Climate change; Bacillariophyta; Algae; Phytoplankton; Water pollution; Metal; Biodiversity; Land use
• ISSN: 0013-936X; 1520-5851; 1520-5851
• DOI: 10.1021/es3015452

We subjected a unique set of high-quality paleoecological data to statistical modeling to examine if the biological richness and evenness of freshwater diatom communities in the Falun area, a historical copper (Cu) mining region in central Sweden, was negatively influenced by 1000 years of metal exposure. Contrary to ecotoxicological predictions, we found no negative relation between biodiversity and the sedimentary concentrations of eight metals. Strikingly, our analysis listed metals (Co, Fe, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) or the fractional land cover of cultivated crops, meadow, and herbs indicating land disturbance as potentially promoting biodiversity. However, correlation between metal- and land-cover trends prevented concluding which of these two covariate types positively affected biodiversity. Because historical aqueous metal concentrationsinferred from solid-water partitioningapproached experimental toxicity thresholds for freshwater algae, positive effects of metal mining on biodiversity are unlikely. Instead, the positive relationship between biodiversity and historical land-cover change can be explained by the increasing proportion of opportunistic species when anthropogenic disturbance intensifies. Our analysis illustrates that focusing on the direct toxic effects of metals alone may yield inaccurate environmental assessments on time scales relevant for biodiversity conservation.