Spatial patterns of aeolian sediment deposition in vegetation canopies: Observations from wind tunnel experiments using colored sand

In environments affected by wind erosion, plants act as traps for aeolian sediment, which leads to a small-scale mosaic of depositional and erosional sediment transport regimes. This wind tunnel study used colored sand to visualize spatial patterns of sediment redistribution within grass canopies. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aeolian research Vol. 8; pp. 65 - 73
Main Authors: Suter-Burri, Katrin, Gromke, Christof, Leonard, Katherine C., Graf, Frank
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-03-2013
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In environments affected by wind erosion, plants act as traps for aeolian sediment, which leads to a small-scale mosaic of depositional and erosional sediment transport regimes. This wind tunnel study used colored sand to visualize spatial patterns of sediment redistribution within grass canopies. Wind tunnel experiments were performed with high-, medium- and low-density canopies of Lolium perenne, corresponding to vegetation covers of 47%, 16% and 4%, respectively. In the low and medium-density canopies, the wake areas downstream of the tussocks were the primary locations of sediment deposition. In the medium-density canopy, these wedge-shaped wake deposits overlapped with the adjacent downstream tussocks, while in the low-density canopy they did not, indicating that these vegetation densities respectively represented wake-interference and isolated roughness flow. In the high-density canopy, very few sand grains were entrained by the wind, and were mostly deposited within the disturbed zones surrounding the tussocks. The deposited grains were evenly distributed around the tussocks in the high-density canopy without pronounced accumulations on their upstream, downstream or lateral sides. We interpret the high-density canopy as a skimming flow aerodynamic regime. The fraction of the sand surface which was exposed to erosion was substantially smaller than the area not covered by grasses. It accounted for 67a78% of the non-covered surface in the low-density canopy, and for 44a77% of the surface in the medium-density canopy. This finding indicates that wind erosion models overestimate the sediment source area if they assume the erodible area is the entire exposed surface not covered by roughness elements.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1875-9637
DOI:10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.11.002