True Triaxial Experimental Study of Rockbursts Induced By Ramp and Cyclic Dynamic Disturbances

• Published in: Rock mechanics and rock engineering Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 1027 - 1045
• Main Authors: Su, Guoshao, Hu, Lihua, Feng, Xiating, Yan, Liubin, Zhang, Gangliang, Yan, Sizhou, Zhao, Bin, Yan, Zhaofu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Vienna Springer Vienna 01-04-2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Catastrophic failure analysis; Civil Engineering; Crack propagation; Damage; Disturbance; Disturbances; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Ejection; Energy storage; Fatigue failure; Fragments; Geophysics/Geodesy; Kinetic energy; Original Paper; Rock; Rockbursts; Rocks; Storage capacity; Storage conditions; Strain rate; Dynamic disturbance; Rockburst; Experimental test; Damage evolution; True triaxial test
• ISSN: 0723-2632; 1434-453X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1384-y

A modified rockburst testing system was utilized to reproduce rockbursts induced by ramp and cyclic dynamic disturbances with a low-intermediate strain rate of 2 × 10
−3
–5 × 10
−3
 s
−1
in the laboratory. The experimental results show that both the ramp and cyclic dynamic disturbances play a significant role in inducing rockbursts. In the tests of rockbursts induced by a ramp dynamic disturbance, as the static stress before the dynamic disturbance increases, both the strength of specimens and the kinetic energy of the ejected fragments first increase and then decrease. In the tests of rockbursts induced by a cyclic dynamic disturbance, there exists a rockburst threshold of the static stress and the dynamic disturbance amplitude, and the kinetic energy of the ejected fragments first increases and then decreases as the cyclic dynamic disturbance frequency increases. The main differences between rockbursts induced by ramp dynamic disturbances and those induced by cyclic dynamic disturbances are as follows: the rockburst development process of the former is characterized by an impact failure feature, while that of the latter is characterized by a fatigue failure feature; the damage evolution curve of the specimen of the former has a leap-developing form with a significant catastrophic feature, while that of the latter has an inverted S-shape with a remarkable fatigue damage characteristic; the energy mechanism of the former involves the ramp dynamic disturbance giving extra elastic strain energy to rocks, while that of the latter involves the cyclic dynamic disturbance decreasing the ultimate energy storage capacity of rocks.