Simultaneous Dependence of the Earthquake‐Size Distribution on Faulting Style and Depth

We analyze two high‐quality Southern Californian earthquake catalogues, one with focal mechanisms, to statistically model and test for dependencies of the earthquake‐size distribution, the b values, on both faulting style and depth. In our null hypothesis, b is assumed constant. We then develop and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters Vol. 46; no. 20; pp. 11044 - 11053
Main Authors: Petruccelli, A., Gasperini, P., Tormann, T., Schorlemmer, D., Rinaldi, A.P., Vannucci, G., Wiemer, S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington John Wiley & Sons, Inc 28-10-2019
American Geophysical Union
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We analyze two high‐quality Southern Californian earthquake catalogues, one with focal mechanisms, to statistically model and test for dependencies of the earthquake‐size distribution, the b values, on both faulting style and depth. In our null hypothesis, b is assumed constant. We then develop and calibrate one model based only on faulting style, another based only on depth dependence and two models that assume a simultaneous dependence on both parameters. We develop a new maximum‐likelihood estimator corrected for the degrees of freedom to assess models' performances. Our results show that all models significantly reject the null hypothesis. The best performing is the one that simultaneously takes account of depth and faulting style. Our results suggest that differential stress variations in the Earth's crust systematically influence b values and that this variability should be considered for contemporary seismic hazard studies. Key Points We model the dependence of the b value on depth and tectonic style in Southern California Statistical tests reveal that faulting style affects the b value more than depth Simultaneous dependencies result with high statistical significance in the best data description
Bibliography:AC02-05CH11231
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/2019GL083997