Social Dominance Orientation and Intergroup Bias: The Legitimation of Favoritism for High-Status Groups

Based on both classical and contemporary perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy, it was hypothesized that the pattern of relationships between social dominance orientation (SDO) and favoritism for high-status groups would depend on the status of one’s group and the perceived legitimacy of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality & social psychology bulletin Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 144 - 157
Main Authors: Levin, Shana, Federico, Christopher M., Sidanius, Jim, Rabinowitz, Joshua L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01-02-2002
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on both classical and contemporary perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy, it was hypothesized that the pattern of relationships between social dominance orientation (SDO) and favoritism for high-status groups would depend on the status of one’s group and the perceived legitimacy of the group-based status distinction. Among members of high-status groups, SDO was expected to be positively related to favoritism for the high-status group at both high and low levels of legitimacy. Among members of low-status groups, SDO and high-status group favoritism were only expected to be positively related when the system was perceived to be legitimate. The results of two studies provided a clear pattern of support for these expectations. Implications for social dominance theory and other perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0146-1672
1552-7433
DOI:10.1177/0146167202282002