Engineering Students Learning Preferences in UNITEN: Comparative Study and Patterns of Learning Styles

• Published in: Educational Technology ＆ Society Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 266 - 281
• Main Authors: Lee, Chen Kang, Sidhu, Manjit Singh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Palmerston North International Forum of Educational Technology ＆ Society 01-07-2015; International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
• Subjects: Active learning; Analysis; Cognitive Style; Cognitive styles; College Students; Comparative studies; Education; Educational environment; Educational Technology; Engineering Education; Engineering schools; Engineering students; Experiential Learning; Foreign Countries; Full Length Articles; Learning; Learning experiences; Learning procedures; Learning Strategies; Learning Style Inventory (Kolb); Learning styles; Malaysia; Measures (Individuals); Mechanical engineering; Methods; Myers Briggs Type Indicator; Personality Measures; Preferences; Problem solving; Questionnaires; Science education; Scores; Statistical Analysis; Statistical methods; Student Attitudes; Students; Study and teaching; Surveys; Teaching Methods; Transfer of Training; Visual learning; Malaysia; United Kingdom; Learning preferences; Engineering education; Learning styles; Educational technology
• ISSN: 1176-3647; 1436-4522; 1436-4522

Engineering educators have been increasingly taking the learning style theories into serious consideration as part of their efforts to enhance the teaching and learning in engineering. This paper presents a research study to investigate the learning style preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia by means of the Personality and Learning Styles instruments. Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the collected samples (n = 122). The findings of this study revealed that the preference style for engineering students are more towards spontaneous, pragmatic and concrete style of learning. This is consistent with the previous research findings on the learning preference for engineering students in UNITEN using Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) and Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Style (ILS) instruments. Therefore, it is important for the engineering educators to be aware of the students learning preferences by adjusting the teaching and learning strategies to unleash the learning potential of the students. Multi-approaches in teaching and learning are recommended to accommodate different students learning preferences while widening the students learning capabilities in engineering education.