Robust Estimators for Data Reconciliation

In this work, a comparative performance analysis of robust data reconciliation strategies is presented. The study involves two procedures based on the biweight function and three estimation techniques that use the Welsh, quasi-weighted least squares, and correntropy M-estimators. The aforementioned...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research Vol. 54; no. 18; pp. 5096 - 5105
Main Authors: Llanos, Claudia E, Sanchéz, Mabel C, Maronna, Ricardo A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: American Chemical Society 13-05-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this work, a comparative performance analysis of robust data reconciliation strategies is presented. The study involves two procedures based on the biweight function and three estimation techniques that use the Welsh, quasi-weighted least squares, and correntropy M-estimators. The aforementioned functions are selected for comparative purposes because their use in the data reconciliation literature has appeared during the past decade. All procedures are properly tuned to have the same estimation and gross error detection/identification capabilities under the ideal distribution. Different measurement models are systematically taken into account, and results are analyzed considering both performance measures (average number of type I errors, global performance, mean square error) and computational load. The comparative analysis indicates that a simple robust methodology can provide a good balance between those two issues for linear and nonlinear benchmarks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/ie504735a